lizadreams says:
Your work is very good. Sculpture must be very difficult! You definately have a gift. You should do some original work.
This opinion is a typical prejudice of whom does not know a thing about classic sculpture. It's typical from modern art robots. Any brief look at pics on an average book of greek-roman culture reveals how different this piece is from the original classic nude.
I would like to see the face of those who thinks this piece is not that original when they become aware of how this Apollo's body is unique. The complex anatomic distortion creates a 360º visual impact. There's no relation with the natural body. I would like to ask if someone could imagine how I did it. I bet that nobody can even wonder.
This lizadreams makes Picasso-like paintings. I spent my last two decades observing thousands of Picasso-like "artists". I cannot even point out who is who. Nowadays the guidelines of "how to be original" are imposed by the modern global culture. Thanks God I have enough soul to scape from this stupid global art destiny.
Essa opinião é o típico preconceito de quem não sabe porra nenhuma de escultura clássica. É algo típico de robôs da arte moderna. Uma rápida verificada em um livro qualquer de cultura greco-romana revela como esta minha obra é diferente dos nus clássicos.
Gostaria de ver a cara das pessoas que pensam que esta obra não é original no dia que tiverem consciência de como o corpo do Apolo é único.A distorção anatomica cria um impacto visual em 360º. Não há relação alguma com o corpo natural. Gostaria de perguntar se alguém imagina como fiz essa escultura. Duvido que alguém me responda.
Essa lizadreams faz pinturas tipo Picasso. Passei duas décadas conhecendo milhares de "artistas" desse tipo. Nem consigo distinguir um do outro. Mas hoje em dia existe uma cultura global moderna ditando como ser original. Agradeço a Deus por ter alma suficiente para escapar desse destino global imbecil do mundo da arte.
This woman, lizadreams, is the typical modern art robot.
She was the first retarded to attack me. The way she tried to point out a lack of divinity on my work would be funny, but it's just human stupidity in its normal scale.
My reply was polite. I though she would debate with me.
But how could a debate occur when the concerning aspect of discussion is some divine quality that she saw on my Italian drawings? I could show to her many Italian drawings so bad executed that I do not recognize these drawings as having been made by me.
lizadreams says:
Your drawings are good..great, but something is missing. You are still a great artist, far better than I'll ever be, but you're no M.Angelo. M.Agelo's work had divine beauty in the most simple sketches and even in the ugliest figures and portraits.
MichelAngelo▲ says:
You are wrong, lizadreams.
I'm MichelAngelo.
You just can't admit it to yourself because you envy me.
If you knew a little about the art of sculpting you would understand my geometric language of the male nude.
That's what proved my identity to myself, 18 years after the remembering of Vittoria's death.
That's what I'm going to expose to everybody.
But you can't even know what I'm talking about because there's nothing in books about my spatial reconstruction of the human anatomy.
What a pity.
What do you mean about divine beauty?
Could you give me an example?
That sounds to me like pure fetish.
Keep your fetish on ancient art to yourself, OK?
Just an information: this drawing was made in 1985.
